You're right in the middle of vacuuming your living room and smoke starts pouring out the side of your vacuum cleaner. The next day you visit the vacuum fix shop and the technician tells you that that the fix of your antiquated vacuum is going to cost you two hundred dollars. At this point you rule to buy new, but which vacuum is the best buy for the money? The two most beloved brands of vacuum cleaners on the shop are Dyson and Hoover, but which is better. Three variables to reconsider when buying a vacuum cleaner are cost, capabilities, operation and durability.
The main variation in the middle of Hoover and Dyson vacuum cleaners is price point. Dyson vacuum cleaners have always been known to be higher priced than Hoover claiming that you get more vacuum and higher operation for the money. The current Dyson price point for a vacuum cleaner ranges from just under four hundred dollars to the just under six hundred dollars with seven dissimilar models to pick from.
Dyson Vacuum Review
Hoover on the other hand has over thirty five upright units fluctuating from sixty dollars to just under four hundred dollars for the top of the line Hoover platinum series upright. When inspecting what to pay for a vacuum I always look at the warranty. The warranty is commonly a good indication of how firmly the manufacturer believes in the vacuum cleaner it is selling. With Hoover's new Platinum line Hoover has increased their warranty to six years giving the platinum line of vacuums an extra year over Dyson. In the area of warranty and price Hoover beats out Dyson hands down.
The potential of a vacuum cleaner should be matched to the tasks it has to achieve and the environment the vacuum cleaner is going to be used in. For population with multi level homes a lighter vacuum cleaner should be used for ease of carrying it from level to level. population that use a vacuum cleaner for cleaning drapery or baseboard areas should look at a vacuum cleaner that has a plethora of vacuum tools, extended wand distance and lots of accessory tools. In Dyson's case all of their upright vacuums come with a detachable wand and tools designed for other cleaning tasks. In Hoover's case they the Platinum Lightweight bagged upright does not have a detachable wand, but do come with an extra small canister vacuum to compliment the upright.
Although Hoover gives you an upright and a canister vacuum all the in the same box I found that having to use two vacuums instead of one unit took not only extra time but also extra storehouse space. Hoover recently introduced their version of a cyclonic upright called the Uh70015. This vacuum cleaner comes with an aluminum lightweight wand, stretchable eight foot hose and dusting brush. Both manufactures products do a great job in fulfilling all the tasks that a vacuum cleaner has to achieve but for ease of use Dyson makes cleaning a pleasurable experience. Dyson Vacuum cleaners seem be one step ahead of Hoover for maneuverability and the refinement in both looks and engineering.
In the vacuum world cyclonic technology seems to be a synonym for increased performance, but how much best is the cyclonic vacuum over its predecessors. Having professionally reviewed over forty dissimilar vacuum cleaners and working in the wholesale cleaning manufactures for over 15 years I do see that the cyclonic vacuum does have its advantages. A cyclonic vacuum seems to suck up more debris from baseboard areas and has more holding of dirt around the brush area on hard covering floors. On the other hand the power of a cyclonic vacuum can cause havoc on delicate materials such as cotton. Rug edges also seem to pose a problem by getting more unquestionably sucked up by a cyclonic over accepted vacuums cleaner. When seeing at operation be right to look at the areas that you are vacuuming and match its power to the types of materials you are going to clean.
When you're thinking of paying a high price for a vacuum cleaner, endurance is always a concern. If you look at the life of a vacuum cleaner versus the price you're paying, the top end Dyson would cost you one hundred and twenty dollars a year if the vacuum cleaner lasts five years or the life of its warranty. In Hoover's case, if the Platinum Cyclonic were to last you six years, or the life of its warranty you would be paying sixty seven dollars a year. seeing at the endurance of higher end sell vacuums I would base its life expectancy on the warranty of the unit. Most higher priced vacuums cost more to repair, and in the case of catastrophic failure you would be best to discard the vacuum than to have it repaired. For this guess I would always base the life expectancy of a higher end vacuum of the distance of the warranty. With the exception of the vacuum cleaner being broken by owner neglect the vacuum cleaner should cost very miniature to fix with the aid of the warranty covering most of the bill.
Overall if you're seeing to save some money and get a new vacuum cleaner every five or six years the Hoover Platinum Cyclonic seems to be the best buy. With just under two hundred dollars in savings the Hoover unit has a best warranty and will achieve the same tasks as Dyson's most expensive vacuum. Dyson does have some other features such as ball technology which enables the user to maneuver the vacuum for efficiently. If you're seeing for these types of features Dyson's lineup might be best powerful to your needs.
Are Hoover Platinum Vacuum Cleaners best Than Dyson Vacuums?